-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - zoho-sheet #14633
New Components - zoho-sheet #14633
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several new modules for the Zoho Sheet application, including actions for creating, updating, and deleting rows, as well as sources for emitting events related to new or updated rows and new workbooks. Additionally, it removes an outdated Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
733e7a8
to
b476fcf
Compare
Sources - New Row (Instant) - New Or Updated Row (Instant) - New Workbook (Instant) Actions - Create Row - Search Delete Row - Update Row
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @luancazarine I've just left one minor observation other than that lgtm! Ready for QA!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
components/zoho_sheet/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-2
: Consider adding input type validationWhile the function handles falsy values appropriately, it might be helpful to add explicit type checking for the input parameter to prevent unexpected behavior with non-serializable objects.
export const parseObject = (obj) => { + if (obj === null || obj === undefined) return undefined; + if (typeof obj !== 'string' && !Array.isArray(obj) && typeof obj !== 'object') { + throw new TypeError('Input must be a string, array, or object'); + } - if (!obj) return undefined;components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs (2)
4-11
: Enhance the component descriptionThe description could be more detailed to help users understand the component's capabilities better.
- description: "Emit new event whenever a new workbook is created.", + description: "Emit new event whenever a new workbook is created in Zoho Sheet. Optionally monitor a specific location.",
17-19
: Document the expected event structureThe
getSummary
method usesworkbook_name
andresource_id
properties from the event object. These properties should be documented to help with maintenance and debugging.Add JSDoc comments to describe the expected event structure:
+ /** + * @param {Object} event - The webhook event object + * @param {string} event.workbook_name - The name of the created workbook + * @param {string} event.resource_id - The unique identifier of the workbook + * @returns {string} A human-readable summary of the event + */ getSummary(event) { return `New workbook: ${event.workbook_name} (${event.resource_id})`; },components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs (1)
12-30
: Consider adding required field validationWhile the props are well-structured with proper dependencies, consider adding validation to ensure both workbookId and worksheetId are required fields.
workbookId: { propDefinition: [ common.props.zohoSheet, "workbookId", ], + required: true, }, worksheetId: { propDefinition: [ common.props.zohoSheet, "worksheet", ({ workbookId }) => ({ workbookId, }), ], withLabel: true, + required: true, },components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
4-16
: Add input validation for serviceName prop.While the code removes spaces during webhook creation, it would be better to validate the input earlier and provide clear feedback to users about allowed characters.
serviceName: { type: "string", label: "Service Name", - description: "The name of the webhook.", + description: "The name of the webhook. Only alphanumeric characters are allowed.", + pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$", + errorMessage: "Service name must contain only letters and numbers", },
17-21
: Add JSDoc documentation for the getExtraData method.Since this method serves as an extension point for derived classes, it should be properly documented.
methods: { + /** + * Override this method to provide additional data for webhook creation/deletion + * @returns {Object} Additional data to be included in webhook requests + */ getExtraData() { return {}; }, },components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs (2)
6-11
: Enhance the component description.While the current description is clear, it would be more helpful to mention that this requires worksheet configuration and explain what constitutes a "modification" (e.g., which fields trigger updates).
- description: "Emit new event whenever a row is added or modified.", + description: "Emit new event whenever a row is added or modified in a specified worksheet. Modifications include changes to any cell in the row.",
30-34
: Clarify the alert message about row completion.The current alert message doesn't specify what constitutes a "completed" row. This could be confusing for users.
- content: "**New row** will be triggered only after the entire row is completed.", + content: "**New row** events will be triggered only after all required cells in the row have values and the row is saved.",components/zoho_sheet/actions/create-row/create-row.mjs (2)
27-32
: Add validation for headerRowConsider adding minimum value validation for the headerRow prop to prevent invalid row numbers.
headerRow: { type: "integer", label: "Header Row", description: "Default value is 1. This can be mentioned if the table header is not in the first row of the worksheet.", optional: true, + min: 1, },
4-54
: Consider implementing rate limitingAs this component is part of a larger Zoho Sheet integration, consider implementing rate limiting to handle API quotas and prevent throttling.
This could be implemented at the app level (
zoho_sheet.app.mjs
) using a rate limiter utility to ensure all components respect API limits.components/zoho_sheet/actions/update-row/update-row.mjs (3)
4-9
: Consider starting with version 1.0.0Since this is a new component that will be published for production use, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate a stable, production-ready release.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",
34-41
: Improve criteria prop descriptionThe description references "as described above" but there's no prior description in the component. Consider providing a clear example of the criteria format.
- description: "If criteria is not set all available rows will get updated. Mention the criteria as described above.", + description: "Specify the criteria to identify rows for updating. Example: {\"columnName\":\"value\"}. If not set, all available rows will be updated.",
55-62
: Enhance data prop description and validationThe data property's description could be improved with better formatting and validation guidance.
- description: "The JSON data that needs to be updated. Example:{\"Month\":\"May\",\"Amount\":50}", + description: "The data to update in the matched rows. Provide a JSON object where keys are column names and values are the new values to set.\n\nExample:\n```json\n{\n \"Month\": \"May\",\n \"Amount\": 50\n}\n```\n\nNote: Values must match the column data types in your worksheet.",components/zoho_sheet/actions/search-delete-row/search-delete-row.mjs (2)
42-47
: Fix typo in rowArray description.The description contains a spelling error: "indexs" should be "indices".
- description: "Array of row indexs, which needs to be deleted.", + description: "Array of row indices, which needs to be deleted.",
67-87
: Consider enhancing error handling and response details.While the implementation is generally good, consider these improvements:
- The summary message could include more details (e.g., number of rows deleted)
- Add response validation before returning
async run({ $ }) { if (!this.criteria && !this.rowArray) { throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide at least **Criteria** or **Row Array** to process this request."); } const response = await this.zohoSheet.deleteRow({ $, workbookId: this.workbookId, data: { worksheet_id: this.worksheet, header_row: this.headerRow, criteria: this.criteria, row_array: JSON.stringify(parseObject(this.rowArray)), first_match_only: this.firstMatchOnly, is_case_sensitive: this.isCaseSensitive, delete_rows: this.deleteRows, }, }); + if (!response?.data) { + throw new Error("Unexpected API response format"); + } + + const deletedCount = response.data.deleted_count || 0; $.export("$summary", - `Row matching criteria deleted successfully from worksheet ${this.worksheet}` + `Successfully deleted ${deletedCount} row(s) from worksheet ${this.worksheet}` ); return response; },components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs (2)
45-45
: Typographical Error in DescriptionThe description for the
headerRow
property ends with double periods. Please remove the extra period.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- description: "By default, first row of the worksheet is considered as header row. This can be used if tabular data starts from any row other than the first row..", + description: "By default, first row of the worksheet is considered as header row. This can be used if tabular data starts from any row other than the first row.",
76-89
: Clarify Parameter Naming in_makeRequest
MethodIn the
_makeRequest
method, themethod
parameter is used both as a function argument and within the data payload sent to the API. This might cause confusion. Consider renaming the data payload'smethod
parameter toapiMethod
or similar to distinguish it from the HTTP method.Apply this diff to clarify parameter naming:
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, data, method, ...opts }) { return axios($, { method: "POST", url: this._baseUrl() + path, headers: this._headers(), data: { ...data, - method, + apiMethod: method, }, ...opts, }); },Also, update the calls to
_makeRequest
accordingly:- method: "workbook.list", + apiMethod: "workbook.list",Repeat this change for all instances where
_makeRequest
is called.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
components/zoho_sheet/.gitignore
(0 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/actions/create-row/create-row.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/actions/search-delete-row/search-delete-row.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/actions/update-row/update-row.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/app/zoho_sheet.app.ts
(0 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/common/utils.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/package.json
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/test-event.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/test-event.mjs
(1 hunks)components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/zoho_sheet/.gitignore
- components/zoho_sheet/app/zoho_sheet.app.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (21)
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-8
: Verify webhook payload structure against Zoho Sheet's API documentation
Let's ensure this test event structure matches Zoho Sheet's actual webhook payload format.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information by checking the content of other test events for consistency.
Let me search for webhook implementation and documentation in the source code to verify the payload structure.
Let me check the Zoho Sheet app implementation for API documentation or webhook payload handling.
Let me check the README file for any documentation about webhook payloads.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
Test event structure appears consistent with implementation
The test event structure aligns with the observed patterns in the codebase:
- It contains essential webhook identifiers (
webhook_id
,service_name
) that match other source implementations - The
event
field matches the value returned bygetEvent()
method in the source file - The workbook-specific fields (
workbook_url
,resource_id
,workbook_name
) are appropriate for a new workbook event - The structure is consistent with other webhook test events in the Zoho Sheet component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any Zoho Sheet API documentation or similar webhook implementations
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 5 'zoho.*webhook.*payload' .
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 5 'zoho.*sheet.*webhook' .
# Look for other test events in the codebase for consistency
fd -e mjs -e js 'test-event' components/zoho_sheet
Length of output: 381
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check contents of other test events
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/test-event.mjs
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs
# Look for webhook handling code
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 10 'handleWebhook' components/zoho_sheet/
Length of output: 880
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for webhook implementation
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 10 'app.post.*webhook' components/zoho_sheet/
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 10 'createHook|createWebhook' components/zoho_sheet/
# Check source files for documentation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs
Length of output: 2377
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Zoho Sheet app implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs
# Look for any documentation files
fd -e md . components/zoho_sheet/
Length of output: 4113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check README content
cat components/zoho_sheet/README.md
# Look for any webhook-related test files
fd -e test.js -e test.mjs . components/zoho_sheet/
Length of output: 2405
components/zoho_sheet/package.json (3)
3-3
: Verify semantic versioning for new features
The version bump from 0.0.3 to 0.1.0 correctly follows semver for new feature additions (webhook sources and actions). However, ensure all breaking changes are documented.
✅ Verification successful
Version bump is appropriate and no breaking changes detected
The version bump from 0.0.3 to 0.1.0 is correct as:
- All imports use relative paths (
../../zoho_sheet.app.mjs
) rather than the dist path - No external components depend on this package
- The changes add new features (webhook sources and actions) which justifies a minor version bump
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in the codebase
# Check for any existing exports that might be affected
rg -l "from.*zoho_sheet"
# Check for existing import patterns that might break
rg -l "dist/app/zoho_sheet.app.mjs"
Length of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files importing zoho_sheet to understand the import patterns
for file in $(rg -l "from.*zoho_sheet"); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "from.*zoho_sheet" "$file" -A 2
done
# Check if there are any other package.json files referencing this component
rg -l "zoho_sheet" "**/package.json"
Length of output: 1460
15-16
: Verify platform dependency compatibility
The addition of @pipedream/platform dependency is essential for the new components. The caret version (^3.0.3) allows minor updates.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can see that the @pipedream/platform
dependency version ^3.0.3
in the zoho_sheet/package.json
file is consistent with many other components in the codebase. The version range ^3.0.3
allows for compatible minor updates and is commonly used across multiple components.
Platform dependency version is compatible with the codebase
The caret version range ^3.0.3
is widely used across the codebase and follows the established pattern for platform dependency versioning.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for platform dependency usage and compatibility
# Check for platform imports in new components
rg "from.*@pipedream/platform"
# Check other components' platform versions for consistency
fd package.json -x jq -r 'select(.dependencies."@pipedream/platform") | .dependencies."@pipedream/platform"'
Length of output: 290566
5-5
: Verify build configuration for simplified main path
The simplified main entry point path suggests a change in the build/distribution structure. Ensure this aligns with the build configuration and doesn't break existing imports.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any build configuration files or build scripts that could be impacted by this change.
No build configuration impact from main path change
The simplified main entry point path is valid as:
- The target file
zoho_sheet.app.mjs
exists in the component directory - There are no build scripts or special build configuration files that would be affected
- The package.json is minimal without any build-specific configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify build configuration and package structure
# Check for build config files
fd -t f "rollup.config|webpack.config|tsconfig"
# Check for related build scripts in root package.json
cat package.json | jq '.scripts | select(. | test("build|dist"))'
Length of output: 290566
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for build config files in component directory
fd -t f "rollup.config|webpack.config|tsconfig|package.json" components/zoho_sheet/
# Check for build scripts in component's package.json
if [ -f "components/zoho_sheet/package.json" ]; then
cat components/zoho_sheet/package.json | jq '.scripts'
fi
# Check if the file exists at the specified path
ls -l components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs
Length of output: 367
components/zoho_sheet/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24
: Verify usage in Zoho Sheet components
The function is used in multiple Zoho Sheet components. Let's verify its integration with the components that consume it.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have clear evidence of how parseObject
is being used across the Zoho Sheet components.
parseObject
usage verified and properly integrated
The function is correctly used in three Zoho Sheet action components, where it's consistently applied to parse data before JSON stringification:
update-row.mjs
: Processesthis.data
for row updatessearch-delete-row.mjs
: Handlesthis.rowArray
for row deletioncreate-row.mjs
: Managesthis.data
for row creation
All usages follow the same pattern of wrapping parseObject
within JSON.stringify()
, which aligns with the function's purpose of safely handling various data types before JSON operations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all files that import and use parseObject
# Find all files that import from utils.mjs
echo "Files importing parseObject:"
rg -l "import.*parseObject.*from.*utils" components/zoho_sheet/
# Show the context of parseObject usage
echo "\nUsage context:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "parseObject\(" components/zoho_sheet/
Length of output: 1877
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs (2)
21-21
: Verify the test event structure
Let's ensure the test event matches the expected webhook payload structure.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output from the shell script, I can see that the test event structure in test-event.mjs
contains all the necessary properties including workbook_name
, resource_id
, workbook_url
, webhook_id
, service_name
, and event
. The structure matches the expected webhook payload for a new workbook event.
Test event structure verified successfully
The sample event includes all required properties with appropriate placeholder values for a new workbook webhook event.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the test event structure
# Expected: Test event should contain workbook_name and resource_id
# Display the test event structure
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/test-event.mjs
# Look for required properties in the test event
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
workbook_name: $_,
resource_id: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 676
1-2
: Verify the common base implementation
The component correctly extends the common base functionality. Let's verify the required methods are implemented in the base module.
✅ Verification successful
Base implementation is correctly structured for webhook handling
The common base module provides all necessary webhook functionality through its lifecycle hooks and methods:
activate()
hook handles webhook creationdeactivate()
hook handles webhook cleanuprun()
method processes incoming webhook events- Extensible design with
getExtraData()
method for source-specific customization
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the common base implementation for required webhook methods
# Expected: Methods for webhook handling should be present in the base module
# Check the base module implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs
# Look for webhook-related method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
methods: {
$$$
setupWebhook($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 676
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check the base implementation
# First, check if the base.mjs file exists and view its contents
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs
# Also search for any webhook-related patterns in the codebase
rg -l "setupWebhook|processEvent" --type js components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/
# Search for webhook method implementations with ripgrep for better context
rg "setupWebhook.*\{" -A 5 --type js components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/
Length of output: 1259
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs (3)
4-11
: LGTM! Component metadata is well-defined
The component metadata follows best practices:
- Unique and properly formatted key
- Clear description
- Appropriate version for new component
- Correct deduplication strategy for webhook events
1-2
: Verify test event implementation
The module imports a test event, but we should ensure it provides comprehensive test coverage for various scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if this test event aligns with the actual implementation by checking the component's code and its base implementation.
Test event implementation is properly aligned with component functionality
The test event implementation is correctly structured and provides appropriate test coverage for the component:
- It includes all required fields that match the webhook payload structure (
webhook_id
,service_name
,event
) - Contains sample row data with relevant fields (
Name
,Age
,Marks
,row_index
,row_type
) - The
event
field matches the component'sgetEvent()
method which returns "new_row" - The data structure aligns with the component's emit functionality in the base implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if test event file exists and contains proper test data
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 391
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the component implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs
# Check the base implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs
Length of output: 2189
46-46
: Verify sample event data structure
Ensure the sample event data structure matches the actual webhook payload from Zoho Sheet.
components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
1-3
: LGTM! Clean module structure.
The import statement and module structure follow ES module conventions correctly.
1-50
: Verify webhook source implementations.
The base class provides the foundation for the webhook sources mentioned in the PR objectives (new-row-instant, new-or-updated-row-instant, new-workbook-instant). Let's verify their implementations.
✅ Verification successful
All required webhook sources are properly implemented
The verification confirms that all three webhook sources mentioned in the PR objectives are implemented and correctly extend the base class:
new-workbook-instant
new-row-instant
new-or-updated-row-instant
Each source properly imports and spreads the common base implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all required webhook sources are implemented and extend this base class
# Check for the existence of webhook source files
echo "Checking webhook source implementations..."
fd -e mjs -p "new-row-instant|new-or-updated-row-instant|new-workbook-instant" components/zoho_sheet/sources/
# Verify they extend the base class
for file in $(fd -e mjs -p "new-row-instant|new-or-updated-row-instant|new-workbook-instant" components/zoho_sheet/sources/); do
echo "\nChecking $file for base class implementation..."
rg -A 5 "import.*base" "$file"
done
Length of output: 4001
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs (2)
1-2
: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-organized, importing only the necessary dependencies.
4-54
: Consider implementing retry logic for webhook delivery.
As this is a webhook source for critical data changes, consider implementing retry logic or error handling for failed webhook deliveries to ensure no updates are missed.
components/zoho_sheet/actions/create-row/create-row.mjs (2)
1-2
: LGTM: Imports are properly structured
The imports are correctly defined and include necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.
4-9
: Verify the documentation link accessibility
The component metadata is well-structured, but let's verify the documentation link.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is accessible and valid
The documentation link https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/
returns a 200 OK status, confirming it's accessible and valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Zoho Sheet API documentation link
curl -I "https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/" | grep "HTTP/"
Length of output: 474
components/zoho_sheet/actions/update-row/update-row.mjs (2)
1-2
: LGTM: Imports are correctly structured
The necessary dependencies are properly imported with relative paths.
1-81
: Verify integration with other Zoho Sheet components
Since this is part of a larger Zoho Sheet integration, let's verify the consistency across components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the component integration.
Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:
Integration verification successful
The component shows consistent integration with other Zoho Sheet components:
- Common utility
parseObject
is properly imported and used across multiple actions (create-row, update-row, search-delete-row) - Data handling is consistent, using
JSON.stringify
withparseObject
for data transformation - Component follows the same structure as other actions in the integration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency across Zoho Sheet components
# Check for consistent prop definitions across components
echo "Checking prop definitions consistency..."
rg -A 5 "propDefinition.*zohoSheet" components/zoho_sheet/
# Check for consistent error handling patterns
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg "throw new Error" components/zoho_sheet/
# Check for consistent version numbers
echo "Checking version numbers..."
rg '"version":' components/zoho_sheet/
Length of output: 441
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent usage of common utilities and prop definitions
echo "Checking common utilities usage..."
rg -l "parseObject" components/zoho_sheet/
echo "\nChecking workbook and worksheet prop definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinition: [
zohoSheet,
"workbookId"
]'
echo "\nChecking data handling in actions..."
rg -A 3 "JSON.stringify" components/zoho_sheet/
echo "\nChecking component versions..."
fd -e mjs$ . components/zoho_sheet/ -x grep -l "version"
Length of output: 1879
components/zoho_sheet/actions/search-delete-row/search-delete-row.mjs (2)
1-4
: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, using named imports and clear dependency management.
5-11
: Verify the documentation link accessibility.
The documentation link in the description should be verified to ensure it's accessible and points to the correct API version.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is valid and accessible
The provided documentation link https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/
returns a 200 OK response, confirming it's accessible and functional.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Zoho Sheet API documentation link
curl -I "https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/" | grep "HTTP/"
Length of output: 474
components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs (1)
71-72
: Verify Authorization Header Format
Please confirm that the Authorization
header format "Zoho-oauthtoken ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}"
is correct and accepted by the Zoho Sheet API. Ensuring the correct header format is crucial for successful API authentication.
Run the following script to double-check the expected header format in the API documentation:
✅ Verification successful
Authorization Header Format is Correct
The Zoho-oauthtoken
authorization header format used in the code is verified to be correct. This is evidenced by its consistent usage across multiple Zoho API integrations in the codebase, including:
- Zoho Assist
- Zoho CRM
- Zoho Mail
- Zoho Calendar
- Zoho Books
- And many other Zoho services
The format "Authorization": "Zoho-oauthtoken ${oauth_access_token}"
is the standard authentication method used throughout all Zoho API implementations in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct format for the Authorization header in Zoho Sheet API.
# Test: Fetch the API documentation for Zoho Sheet authentication headers.
curl -s 'https://www.zoho.com/sheet/api/' | grep -i 'Authorization'
Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of Zoho API authorization headers in the codebase
rg -i "Zoho-oauthtoken" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for any Zoho API related documentation or configuration files
fd -e md -e txt -e json | xargs rg -i "zoho.*auth"
# Look for similar authorization patterns in other Zoho-related files
fd zoho | xargs rg -i "authorization.*header"
Length of output: 20209
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Jorge Cortes <[email protected]>
/approve |
Resolves #14584.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
.gitignore
file, which may lead to a cluttered repository.Documentation
package.json
to reflect new versioning and dependencies.Chores