Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Components - zoho-sheet #14633

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

New Components - zoho-sheet #14633

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine commented Nov 12, 2024

Resolves #14584.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced modules for creating, updating, and deleting rows in Zoho Sheets.
    • Added event sources for new rows, updated rows, and new workbooks.
    • Enhanced webhook management capabilities for real-time updates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed obsolete .gitignore file, which may lead to a cluttered repository.
  • Documentation

    • Updated package.json to reflect new versioning and dependencies.
  • Chores

    • Restructured file organization for improved clarity and maintainability.

@luancazarine luancazarine added the ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification label Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 14, 2024 3:19pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 14, 2024 3:19pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 14, 2024 3:19pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several new modules for the Zoho Sheet application, including actions for creating, updating, and deleting rows, as well as sources for emitting events related to new or updated rows and new workbooks. Additionally, it removes an outdated .gitignore file, updates the package.json version, and introduces a new utility function for parsing objects. The changes enhance the integration capabilities of the Zoho Sheet component with the Pipedream platform.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/zoho_sheet/.gitignore Deleted the .gitignore file, which previously ignored .js, .mjs files, and the dist directory.
components/zoho_sheet/actions/create-row/create-row.mjs Added a new module for creating rows in a worksheet, including properties for configuration and an asynchronous run method.
components/zoho_sheet/actions/search-delete-row/search-delete-row.mjs Introduced a module for searching and deleting rows based on criteria, with error handling and an asynchronous run method.
components/zoho_sheet/actions/update-row/update-row.mjs Added a module for updating rows in a worksheet, featuring properties for configuration and an asynchronous run method.
components/zoho_sheet/app/zoho_sheet.app.ts Deleted the zoho_sheet.app.ts file, which defined the application and its authentication method.
components/zoho_sheet/common/utils.mjs Introduced the parseObject utility function for robust input handling.
components/zoho_sheet/package.json Updated version from 0.0.3 to 0.1.0, changed the main entry point, removed the files array, and added a new dependency on @pipedream/platform.
components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs Added a new module for managing webhooks, including properties and methods for activation and deactivation.
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs Introduced a source module for emitting events related to new or updated rows, with properties and methods for event handling.
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs Added a source module for emitting events when a new row is created, with properties and methods defined.
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs Introduced a source module for emitting events related to new workbook creation, including specific methods for event identification and summarization.
components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs Introduced a new application module for interacting with the Zoho Sheet API, defining properties and methods for various operations.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Emit new event each time a new row is created. (14584)
Emit new event whenever a row is added or modified. (14584)
Emit new event whenever a new workbook is created. (14584)
Creates a new row in a specified worksheet. (14584)
Finds a specific row via its index and updates its content. (14584)

Suggested labels

action, trigger / source

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927

Poem

In the land of sheets where rows align,
New actions bloom, oh how they shine!
With a hop and a skip, we create and delete,
In Zoho's embrace, our tasks are complete.
So let’s cheer for the changes, both big and small,
For in this code garden, we’ll flourish and sprawl! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3f0fd6 and 09f21ac.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sources
 - New Row (Instant)
 - New Or Updated Row (Instant)
 - New Workbook (Instant)

Actions
 - Create Row
 - Search Delete Row
 - Update Row
@luancazarine luancazarine marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2024 21:48
jcortes
jcortes previously approved these changes Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @luancazarine I've just left one minor observation other than that lgtm! Ready for QA!

components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
components/zoho_sheet/common/utils.mjs (1)

1-2: Consider adding input type validation

While the function handles falsy values appropriately, it might be helpful to add explicit type checking for the input parameter to prevent unexpected behavior with non-serializable objects.

 export const parseObject = (obj) => {
+  if (obj === null || obj === undefined) return undefined;
+  if (typeof obj !== 'string' && !Array.isArray(obj) && typeof obj !== 'object') {
+    throw new TypeError('Input must be a string, array, or object');
+  }
-  if (!obj) return undefined;
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs (2)

4-11: Enhance the component description

The description could be more detailed to help users understand the component's capabilities better.

-  description: "Emit new event whenever a new workbook is created.",
+  description: "Emit new event whenever a new workbook is created in Zoho Sheet. Optionally monitor a specific location.",

17-19: Document the expected event structure

The getSummary method uses workbook_name and resource_id properties from the event object. These properties should be documented to help with maintenance and debugging.

Add JSDoc comments to describe the expected event structure:

+    /**
+     * @param {Object} event - The webhook event object
+     * @param {string} event.workbook_name - The name of the created workbook
+     * @param {string} event.resource_id - The unique identifier of the workbook
+     * @returns {string} A human-readable summary of the event
+     */
     getSummary(event) {
       return  `New workbook: ${event.workbook_name} (${event.resource_id})`;
     },
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs (1)

12-30: Consider adding required field validation

While the props are well-structured with proper dependencies, consider adding validation to ensure both workbookId and worksheetId are required fields.

 workbookId: {
   propDefinition: [
     common.props.zohoSheet,
     "workbookId",
   ],
+  required: true,
 },
 worksheetId: {
   propDefinition: [
     common.props.zohoSheet,
     "worksheet",
     ({ workbookId }) => ({
       workbookId,
     }),
   ],
   withLabel: true,
+  required: true,
 },
components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs (2)

4-16: Add input validation for serviceName prop.

While the code removes spaces during webhook creation, it would be better to validate the input earlier and provide clear feedback to users about allowed characters.

 serviceName: {
   type: "string",
   label: "Service Name",
-  description: "The name of the webhook.",
+  description: "The name of the webhook. Only alphanumeric characters are allowed.",
+  pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$",
+  errorMessage: "Service name must contain only letters and numbers",
 },

17-21: Add JSDoc documentation for the getExtraData method.

Since this method serves as an extension point for derived classes, it should be properly documented.

 methods: {
+  /**
+   * Override this method to provide additional data for webhook creation/deletion
+   * @returns {Object} Additional data to be included in webhook requests
+   */
   getExtraData() {
     return {};
   },
 },
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs (2)

6-11: Enhance the component description.

While the current description is clear, it would be more helpful to mention that this requires worksheet configuration and explain what constitutes a "modification" (e.g., which fields trigger updates).

-  description: "Emit new event whenever a row is added or modified.",
+  description: "Emit new event whenever a row is added or modified in a specified worksheet. Modifications include changes to any cell in the row.",

30-34: Clarify the alert message about row completion.

The current alert message doesn't specify what constitutes a "completed" row. This could be confusing for users.

-      content: "**New row** will be triggered only after the entire row is completed.",
+      content: "**New row** events will be triggered only after all required cells in the row have values and the row is saved.",
components/zoho_sheet/actions/create-row/create-row.mjs (2)

27-32: Add validation for headerRow

Consider adding minimum value validation for the headerRow prop to prevent invalid row numbers.

 headerRow: {
   type: "integer",
   label: "Header Row",
   description: "Default value is 1. This can be mentioned if the table header is not in the first row of the worksheet.",
   optional: true,
+  min: 1,
 },

4-54: Consider implementing rate limiting

As this component is part of a larger Zoho Sheet integration, consider implementing rate limiting to handle API quotas and prevent throttling.

This could be implemented at the app level (zoho_sheet.app.mjs) using a rate limiter utility to ensure all components respect API limits.

components/zoho_sheet/actions/update-row/update-row.mjs (3)

4-9: Consider starting with version 1.0.0

Since this is a new component that will be published for production use, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate a stable, production-ready release.

-  version: "0.0.1",
+  version: "1.0.0",

34-41: Improve criteria prop description

The description references "as described above" but there's no prior description in the component. Consider providing a clear example of the criteria format.

-      description: "If criteria is not set all available rows will get updated. Mention the criteria as described above.",
+      description: "Specify the criteria to identify rows for updating. Example: {\"columnName\":\"value\"}. If not set, all available rows will be updated.",

55-62: Enhance data prop description and validation

The data property's description could be improved with better formatting and validation guidance.

-      description: "The JSON data that needs to be updated. Example:{\"Month\":\"May\",\"Amount\":50}",
+      description: "The data to update in the matched rows. Provide a JSON object where keys are column names and values are the new values to set.\n\nExample:\n```json\n{\n  \"Month\": \"May\",\n  \"Amount\": 50\n}\n```\n\nNote: Values must match the column data types in your worksheet.",
components/zoho_sheet/actions/search-delete-row/search-delete-row.mjs (2)

42-47: Fix typo in rowArray description.

The description contains a spelling error: "indexs" should be "indices".

-      description: "Array of row indexs, which needs to be deleted.",
+      description: "Array of row indices, which needs to be deleted.",

67-87: Consider enhancing error handling and response details.

While the implementation is generally good, consider these improvements:

  1. The summary message could include more details (e.g., number of rows deleted)
  2. Add response validation before returning
   async run({ $ }) {
     if (!this.criteria && !this.rowArray) {
       throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide at least **Criteria** or **Row Array** to process this request.");
     }
     const response = await this.zohoSheet.deleteRow({
       $,
       workbookId: this.workbookId,
       data: {
         worksheet_id: this.worksheet,
         header_row: this.headerRow,
         criteria: this.criteria,
         row_array: JSON.stringify(parseObject(this.rowArray)),
         first_match_only: this.firstMatchOnly,
         is_case_sensitive: this.isCaseSensitive,
         delete_rows: this.deleteRows,
       },
     });
 
+    if (!response?.data) {
+      throw new Error("Unexpected API response format");
+    }
+
+    const deletedCount = response.data.deleted_count || 0;
     $.export("$summary", 
-      `Row matching criteria deleted successfully from worksheet ${this.worksheet}`
+      `Successfully deleted ${deletedCount} row(s) from worksheet ${this.worksheet}`
     );
     return response;
   },
components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs (2)

45-45: Typographical Error in Description

The description for the headerRow property ends with double periods. Please remove the extra period.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-          description: "By default, first row of the worksheet is considered as header row. This can be used if tabular data starts from any row other than the first row..",
+          description: "By default, first row of the worksheet is considered as header row. This can be used if tabular data starts from any row other than the first row.",

76-89: Clarify Parameter Naming in _makeRequest Method

In the _makeRequest method, the method parameter is used both as a function argument and within the data payload sent to the API. This might cause confusion. Consider renaming the data payload's method parameter to apiMethod or similar to distinguish it from the HTTP method.

Apply this diff to clarify parameter naming:

       _makeRequest({
         $ = this, path, data, method, ...opts
       }) {
         return axios($, {
           method: "POST",
           url: this._baseUrl() + path,
           headers: this._headers(),
           data: {
             ...data,
-            method,
+            apiMethod: method,
           },
           ...opts,
         });
       },

Also, update the calls to _makeRequest accordingly:

-        method: "workbook.list",
+        apiMethod: "workbook.list",

Repeat this change for all instances where _makeRequest is called.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7b1c4e and d3f0fd6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
  • components/zoho_sheet/.gitignore (0 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/actions/create-row/create-row.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/actions/search-delete-row/search-delete-row.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/actions/update-row/update-row.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/app/zoho_sheet.app.ts (0 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/package.json (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • components/zoho_sheet/.gitignore
  • components/zoho_sheet/app/zoho_sheet.app.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/test-event.mjs
  • components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (21)
components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/test-event.mjs (1)

1-8: Verify webhook payload structure against Zoho Sheet's API documentation

Let's ensure this test event structure matches Zoho Sheet's actual webhook payload format.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information by checking the content of other test events for consistency.


Let me search for webhook implementation and documentation in the source code to verify the payload structure.


Let me check the Zoho Sheet app implementation for API documentation or webhook payload handling.


Let me check the README file for any documentation about webhook payloads.


Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:

Test event structure appears consistent with implementation

The test event structure aligns with the observed patterns in the codebase:

  • It contains essential webhook identifiers (webhook_id, service_name) that match other source implementations
  • The event field matches the value returned by getEvent() method in the source file
  • The workbook-specific fields (workbook_url, resource_id, workbook_name) are appropriate for a new workbook event
  • The structure is consistent with other webhook test events in the Zoho Sheet component
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any Zoho Sheet API documentation or similar webhook implementations
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 5 'zoho.*webhook.*payload' .
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 5 'zoho.*sheet.*webhook' .

# Look for other test events in the codebase for consistency
fd -e mjs -e js 'test-event' components/zoho_sheet

Length of output: 381


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check contents of other test events
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/test-event.mjs
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs

# Look for webhook handling code
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 10 'handleWebhook' components/zoho_sheet/

Length of output: 880


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for webhook implementation
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 10 'app.post.*webhook' components/zoho_sheet/
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 10 'createHook|createWebhook' components/zoho_sheet/

# Check source files for documentation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs

Length of output: 2377


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Zoho Sheet app implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs

# Look for any documentation files
fd -e md . components/zoho_sheet/

Length of output: 4113


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check README content
cat components/zoho_sheet/README.md

# Look for any webhook-related test files
fd -e test.js -e test.mjs . components/zoho_sheet/

Length of output: 2405

components/zoho_sheet/package.json (3)

3-3: Verify semantic versioning for new features

The version bump from 0.0.3 to 0.1.0 correctly follows semver for new feature additions (webhook sources and actions). However, ensure all breaking changes are documented.

✅ Verification successful

Version bump is appropriate and no breaking changes detected

The version bump from 0.0.3 to 0.1.0 is correct as:

  • All imports use relative paths (../../zoho_sheet.app.mjs) rather than the dist path
  • No external components depend on this package
  • The changes add new features (webhook sources and actions) which justifies a minor version bump
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in the codebase

# Check for any existing exports that might be affected
rg -l "from.*zoho_sheet" 

# Check for existing import patterns that might break
rg -l "dist/app/zoho_sheet.app.mjs"

Length of output: 290


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files importing zoho_sheet to understand the import patterns
for file in $(rg -l "from.*zoho_sheet"); do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  rg "from.*zoho_sheet" "$file" -A 2
done

# Check if there are any other package.json files referencing this component
rg -l "zoho_sheet" "**/package.json"

Length of output: 1460


15-16: Verify platform dependency compatibility

The addition of @pipedream/platform dependency is essential for the new components. The caret version (^3.0.3) allows minor updates.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can see that the @pipedream/platform dependency version ^3.0.3 in the zoho_sheet/package.json file is consistent with many other components in the codebase. The version range ^3.0.3 allows for compatible minor updates and is commonly used across multiple components.

Platform dependency version is compatible with the codebase

The caret version range ^3.0.3 is widely used across the codebase and follows the established pattern for platform dependency versioning.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for platform dependency usage and compatibility

# Check for platform imports in new components
rg "from.*@pipedream/platform"

# Check other components' platform versions for consistency
fd package.json -x jq -r 'select(.dependencies."@pipedream/platform") | .dependencies."@pipedream/platform"'

Length of output: 290566


5-5: Verify build configuration for simplified main path

The simplified main entry point path suggests a change in the build/distribution structure. Ensure this aligns with the build configuration and doesn't break existing imports.

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify if there are any build configuration files or build scripts that could be impacted by this change.


No build configuration impact from main path change

The simplified main entry point path is valid as:

  1. The target file zoho_sheet.app.mjs exists in the component directory
  2. There are no build scripts or special build configuration files that would be affected
  3. The package.json is minimal without any build-specific configuration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify build configuration and package structure

# Check for build config files
fd -t f "rollup.config|webpack.config|tsconfig"

# Check for related build scripts in root package.json
cat package.json | jq '.scripts | select(. | test("build|dist"))'

Length of output: 290566


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for build config files in component directory
fd -t f "rollup.config|webpack.config|tsconfig|package.json" components/zoho_sheet/

# Check for build scripts in component's package.json
if [ -f "components/zoho_sheet/package.json" ]; then
  cat components/zoho_sheet/package.json | jq '.scripts'
fi

# Check if the file exists at the specified path
ls -l components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs

Length of output: 367

components/zoho_sheet/common/utils.mjs (1)

1-24: Verify usage in Zoho Sheet components

The function is used in multiple Zoho Sheet components. Let's verify its integration with the components that consume it.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have clear evidence of how parseObject is being used across the Zoho Sheet components.

parseObject usage verified and properly integrated

The function is correctly used in three Zoho Sheet action components, where it's consistently applied to parse data before JSON stringification:

  • update-row.mjs: Processes this.data for row updates
  • search-delete-row.mjs: Handles this.rowArray for row deletion
  • create-row.mjs: Manages this.data for row creation

All usages follow the same pattern of wrapping parseObject within JSON.stringify(), which aligns with the function's purpose of safely handling various data types before JSON operations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all files that import and use parseObject

# Find all files that import from utils.mjs
echo "Files importing parseObject:"
rg -l "import.*parseObject.*from.*utils" components/zoho_sheet/

# Show the context of parseObject usage
echo "\nUsage context:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "parseObject\(" components/zoho_sheet/

Length of output: 1877

components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/new-workbook-instant.mjs (2)

21-21: Verify the test event structure

Let's ensure the test event matches the expected webhook payload structure.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the output from the shell script, I can see that the test event structure in test-event.mjs contains all the necessary properties including workbook_name, resource_id, workbook_url, webhook_id, service_name, and event. The structure matches the expected webhook payload for a new workbook event.

Test event structure verified successfully

The sample event includes all required properties with appropriate placeholder values for a new workbook webhook event.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the test event structure
# Expected: Test event should contain workbook_name and resource_id

# Display the test event structure
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-workbook-instant/test-event.mjs

# Look for required properties in the test event
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
  $$$
  workbook_name: $_,
  resource_id: $_,
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 676


1-2: Verify the common base implementation

The component correctly extends the common base functionality. Let's verify the required methods are implemented in the base module.

✅ Verification successful

Base implementation is correctly structured for webhook handling

The common base module provides all necessary webhook functionality through its lifecycle hooks and methods:

  • activate() hook handles webhook creation
  • deactivate() hook handles webhook cleanup
  • run() method processes incoming webhook events
  • Extensible design with getExtraData() method for source-specific customization
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the common base implementation for required webhook methods
# Expected: Methods for webhook handling should be present in the base module

# Check the base module implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs

# Look for webhook-related method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
  $$$
  methods: {
    $$$
    setupWebhook($$$) {
      $$$
    }
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 676


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check the base implementation

# First, check if the base.mjs file exists and view its contents
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs

# Also search for any webhook-related patterns in the codebase
rg -l "setupWebhook|processEvent" --type js components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/

# Search for webhook method implementations with ripgrep for better context
rg "setupWebhook.*\{" -A 5 --type js components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/

Length of output: 1259

components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs (3)

4-11: LGTM! Component metadata is well-defined

The component metadata follows best practices:

  • Unique and properly formatted key
  • Clear description
  • Appropriate version for new component
  • Correct deduplication strategy for webhook events

1-2: Verify test event implementation

The module imports a test event, but we should ensure it provides comprehensive test coverage for various scenarios.

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify if this test event aligns with the actual implementation by checking the component's code and its base implementation.


Test event implementation is properly aligned with component functionality

The test event implementation is correctly structured and provides appropriate test coverage for the component:

  • It includes all required fields that match the webhook payload structure (webhook_id, service_name, event)
  • Contains sample row data with relevant fields (Name, Age, Marks, row_index, row_type)
  • The event field matches the component's getEvent() method which returns "new_row"
  • The data structure aligns with the component's emit functionality in the base implementation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if test event file exists and contains proper test data
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/test-event.mjs

Length of output: 391


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the component implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-row-instant/new-row-instant.mjs

# Check the base implementation
cat components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs

Length of output: 2189


46-46: Verify sample event data structure

Ensure the sample event data structure matches the actual webhook payload from Zoho Sheet.

components/zoho_sheet/sources/common/base.mjs (2)

1-3: LGTM! Clean module structure.

The import statement and module structure follow ES module conventions correctly.


1-50: Verify webhook source implementations.

The base class provides the foundation for the webhook sources mentioned in the PR objectives (new-row-instant, new-or-updated-row-instant, new-workbook-instant). Let's verify their implementations.

✅ Verification successful

All required webhook sources are properly implemented

The verification confirms that all three webhook sources mentioned in the PR objectives are implemented and correctly extend the base class:

  • new-workbook-instant
  • new-row-instant
  • new-or-updated-row-instant

Each source properly imports and spreads the common base implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all required webhook sources are implemented and extend this base class

# Check for the existence of webhook source files
echo "Checking webhook source implementations..."
fd -e mjs -p "new-row-instant|new-or-updated-row-instant|new-workbook-instant" components/zoho_sheet/sources/

# Verify they extend the base class
for file in $(fd -e mjs -p "new-row-instant|new-or-updated-row-instant|new-workbook-instant" components/zoho_sheet/sources/); do
  echo "\nChecking $file for base class implementation..."
  rg -A 5 "import.*base" "$file"
done

Length of output: 4001

components/zoho_sheet/sources/new-or-updated-row-instant/new-or-updated-row-instant.mjs (2)

1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.

The imports are well-organized, importing only the necessary dependencies.


4-54: Consider implementing retry logic for webhook delivery.

As this is a webhook source for critical data changes, consider implementing retry logic or error handling for failed webhook deliveries to ensure no updates are missed.

components/zoho_sheet/actions/create-row/create-row.mjs (2)

1-2: LGTM: Imports are properly structured

The imports are correctly defined and include necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.


4-9: Verify the documentation link accessibility

The component metadata is well-structured, but let's verify the documentation link.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation link is accessible and valid

The documentation link https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/ returns a 200 OK status, confirming it's accessible and valid.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Zoho Sheet API documentation link
curl -I "https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/" | grep "HTTP/"

Length of output: 474

components/zoho_sheet/actions/update-row/update-row.mjs (2)

1-2: LGTM: Imports are correctly structured

The necessary dependencies are properly imported with relative paths.


1-81: Verify integration with other Zoho Sheet components

Since this is part of a larger Zoho Sheet integration, let's verify the consistency across components.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the component integration.


Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:

Integration verification successful

The component shows consistent integration with other Zoho Sheet components:

  • Common utility parseObject is properly imported and used across multiple actions (create-row, update-row, search-delete-row)
  • Data handling is consistent, using JSON.stringify with parseObject for data transformation
  • Component follows the same structure as other actions in the integration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency across Zoho Sheet components

# Check for consistent prop definitions across components
echo "Checking prop definitions consistency..."
rg -A 5 "propDefinition.*zohoSheet" components/zoho_sheet/

# Check for consistent error handling patterns
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg "throw new Error" components/zoho_sheet/

# Check for consistent version numbers
echo "Checking version numbers..."
rg '"version":' components/zoho_sheet/

Length of output: 441


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent usage of common utilities and prop definitions
echo "Checking common utilities usage..."
rg -l "parseObject" components/zoho_sheet/

echo "\nChecking workbook and worksheet prop definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinition: [
  zohoSheet,
  "workbookId"
]'

echo "\nChecking data handling in actions..."
rg -A 3 "JSON.stringify" components/zoho_sheet/

echo "\nChecking component versions..."
fd -e mjs$ . components/zoho_sheet/ -x grep -l "version"

Length of output: 1879

components/zoho_sheet/actions/search-delete-row/search-delete-row.mjs (2)

1-4: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.

The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, using named imports and clear dependency management.


5-11: Verify the documentation link accessibility.

The documentation link in the description should be verified to ensure it's accessible and points to the correct API version.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation link is valid and accessible

The provided documentation link https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/ returns a 200 OK response, confirming it's accessible and functional.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Zoho Sheet API documentation link
curl -I "https://www.zoho.com/sheet/help/api/v2/" | grep "HTTP/"

Length of output: 474

components/zoho_sheet/zoho_sheet.app.mjs (1)

71-72: Verify Authorization Header Format

Please confirm that the Authorization header format "Zoho-oauthtoken ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}" is correct and accepted by the Zoho Sheet API. Ensuring the correct header format is crucial for successful API authentication.

Run the following script to double-check the expected header format in the API documentation:

✅ Verification successful

Authorization Header Format is Correct

The Zoho-oauthtoken authorization header format used in the code is verified to be correct. This is evidenced by its consistent usage across multiple Zoho API integrations in the codebase, including:

  • Zoho Assist
  • Zoho CRM
  • Zoho Mail
  • Zoho Calendar
  • Zoho Books
  • And many other Zoho services

The format "Authorization": "Zoho-oauthtoken ${oauth_access_token}" is the standard authentication method used throughout all Zoho API implementations in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct format for the Authorization header in Zoho Sheet API.

# Test: Fetch the API documentation for Zoho Sheet authentication headers.
curl -s 'https://www.zoho.com/sheet/api/' | grep -i 'Authorization'

Length of output: 65


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of Zoho API authorization headers in the codebase
rg -i "Zoho-oauthtoken" -B 2 -A 2

# Search for any Zoho API related documentation or configuration files
fd -e md -e txt -e json | xargs rg -i "zoho.*auth"

# Look for similar authorization patterns in other Zoho-related files
fd zoho | xargs rg -i "authorization.*header"

Length of output: 20209

@luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

@luancazarine luancazarine merged commit 874142e into master Nov 14, 2024
12 checks passed
@luancazarine luancazarine deleted the issue-14584 branch November 14, 2024 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] zoho-sheet
2 participants